Natural Sun Care

A field guide to the mineral and natural sun care category, examined on its chemistry and on the claims it makes for itself.

Edition 2026-08-07Published by Northbank Media
No product recommendations
Editorial standards

Rules written down so that anyone can check whether we keep them

What this publication commits to doing and to not doing, in terms specific enough to be tested.

1. No brand and no product is named

Anywhere on this site, in any context, favourable or otherwise. Filters are referred to by their standardised ingredient names rather than by supplier trade names, because trade names are brands. Regulators, standards organisations, professional bodies, charities and journals are named, because they are institutions rather than products.

2. No sun protection factor is attributed to any plant oil

Including for the purpose of arguing against one. Figures in circulation are described as circulating and their provenance is discussed; they are not restated, because restating a figure is how a figure survives.

3. No rankings, no recommendations, no comparisons of products

This publication has not assessed any product and will not publish a list of businesses it has not assessed. Where a question would naturally produce a ranking, it produces a set of criteria instead.

4. Nothing is invented

No study, statistic, clinic, practitioner, price, case study or safety figure is invented. Where a figure would be needed and cannot be verified, the point is made without it or the piece changes. Several articles here deliberately omit numbers that other sources state confidently, for that reason.

5. Claims carry a published status

From a fixed vocabulary defined in advance, containing no numbers. The argument for a status always sits directly above it.

6. Clinical questions are handed over

At skin cancer, diagnosis, treatment, medication, children's health and supplementation, this publication stops and points to the NHS, NICE, the British Association of Dermatologists, a GP or a pharmacist. It does not offer a second opinion in areas where it has no standing.

7. Sources are institutional and checkable

Regulators, published regulation, scientific committee opinions, national health bodies, professional associations, standards organisations and indexed journals. Where a body of research is described rather than a single paper cited, that is stated.

8. Money cannot buy any of the above

Register entrants and newsletter sponsors cannot influence a claim status, obtain a mention in an article, see material before publication, or have accurate material removed. This is repeated on the criteria page and in what we refuse to sell.

9. Corrections are visible

Inaccuracies are corrected with a dated note. Statuses change when evidence changes, and the change is recorded. Accurate material is not withdrawn at request.

10. External links are nofollow

Every external link on this site carries a nofollow attribute. There are no commercial links of any kind on any page, and no link anywhere has been paid for.

Editorial disclosure. This article contains no commercial links. Nothing on it has been paid for, no company has been given sight of it, and no brand or product is named anywhere on this site. This publication takes no money from sunscreen or skincare companies at any price, and the reasons are set out in what we refuse to sell. Published by Northbank Media.

The dispatch

A monthly note: what has been published, what has changed in a claim's status, and one piece of working. It carries a single clearly labelled sponsor line, at a published rate that cannot influence any status recorded here. Unsubscribe whenever you like.

Your address is used for the dispatch and nothing else. See privacy.